#Losers - why winrate, not $won?
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    67

    Default #Losers - why winrate, not $won?

    Currently, the #Losers column seems to count the number of players with a negative bb/100 at the table (btw. is bb/100 here big blinds/100?) and not the number of players with a negative $won. I am interested in the reasoning and whether you will add a second #Losers column for $won or let us chose in the settings what to count.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    779

    Default

    Well the bb/100 is more reliable I suppose.

    Taking "$won" would lead to distortions when players switch the stake a lot.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Switching stakes a lot causes a distortion either way. If my opponent is winning at a lower stake but losing at higher stakes, would he not be marked a winner altough he probably has leaks and I would not mind playing him at the stakes in question?
    I can undestand your reasoning but really would prefer to have a choice or better yet, be displayed both.

Similar Threads

  1. Multitabling - # of tables vs winrate ??
    By baggin in forum Manager General
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-24-2013, 09:48 AM
  2. winrate bb vs. BB error
    By Self Made in forum Manager General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-29-2008, 12:08 PM
  3. Winrate pr street?
    By benthj in forum Manager General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-16-2008, 04:45 PM
  4. WinRate Pop Up not Color Blind friendly
    By agc1976 in forum Manager General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-20-2008, 02:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •