Preflop Action Sequences bug possible, need to check

[FALOs]

Hey.

Faced a situation that I just can't get it to exclude situations when a player sitting on the big blind calls someone's raise. That is, the definition should work when the player sitting on the BB remained in the free play, and should NOT work when someone raised before the player's sitting on BB make move.

Ie this should be processed for PAKP0L13:

PokerStars Hand #106721162868: Hold'em No Limit ($500/$1000 USD) - 2020/11/28 15:31:28 UTC
Table 'PKDOM_IDNP_TXH10672' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: CAPTAINJEC ($39845 in chips)
Seat 2: Z22E2W26 ($58946 in chips)
Seat 4: PAKP0L13 ($20211 in chips)
Seat 5: B_3_NKS ($17216 in chips)
Seat 6: AZRINA1234 ($8115 in chips)
# {"gt":"NLTHP","tn":"PKDOM_IDNP_TXH10672","tid":106 72,"pn":{"0":"CAPTAINJEC","1":"Z22E2W26","3":"PAKP 0L13","4":"B_3_NKS","5":"AZRINA1234"},"pids":{"0": 333350066,"1":286540022,"3":500171050,"4":32657977 3,"5":540997782},"room":"Idnp"}
Z22E2W26: posts small blind $500
PAKP0L13: posts big blind $1000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Z22E2W26 [3h 2d]
B_3_NKS: calls $1000
AZRINA1234: calls $1000
CAPTAINJEC: calls $1000
Z22E2W26: folds
PAKP0L13: checks
*** FLOP *** [7h 4s 8h]
PAKP0L13: checks
B_3_NKS: bets $1000
AZRINA1234: calls $1000
CAPTAINJEC: folds
PAKP0L13: calls $1000
*** TURN *** [7h 4s 8h] [9d]
PAKP0L13: checks
B_3_NKS: checks
AZRINA1234: checks
*** RIVER *** [7h 4s 8h 9d] [Js]
PAKP0L13: bets $3000
B_3_NKS: folds
AZRINA1234: folds
Uncalled bet ($3000) returned to PAKP0L13
PAKP0L13 collected $7275 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $7500 | Rake $225
Board [7h 4s 8h 9d Js]
Seat 1: CAPTAINJEC (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: Z22E2W26 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: PAKP0L13 (big blind) collected ($7275)
Seat 5: B_3_NKS folded on the River
Seat 6: AZRINA1234 folded on the River

and this NOT:


PokerStars Hand #106728892853: Hold'em No Limit ($500/$1000 USD) - 2020/11/28 15:16:17 UTC
Table 'PKDOM_IDNP_TXH10672' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 2: Z22E2W26 ($50285 in chips)
Seat 3: KIKIFADIL ($18310 in chips)
Seat 4: PAKP0L13 ($9326 in chips)
Seat 5: XZYBIT ($34067 in chips)
Seat 6: AZRINA1234 ($16000 in chips)
# {"gt":"NLTHP","tn":"PKDOM_IDNP_TXH10672","tid":106 72,"pn":{"1":"Z22E2W26","2":"KIKIFADIL","3":"PAKP0 L13","4":"XZYBIT","5":"AZRINA1234"},"pids":{"1":28 6540022,"2":493701492,"3":500171050,"4":543833288, "5":540997782},"room":"Idnp"}
KIKIFADIL: posts small blind $500
PAKP0L13: posts big blind $1000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Z22E2W26 [Jh Qd]
XZYBIT: folds
AZRINA1234: calls $1000
Z22E2W26: raises $2000 to $3000
KIKIFADIL: folds
PAKP0L13: calls $2000
AZRINA1234: calls $2000
*** FLOP *** [8s 3c 9s]
PAKP0L13: bets $5700
AZRINA1234: folds
Z22E2W26: raises $5700 to $11400
PAKP0L13: calls $626 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($5074) returned to Z22E2W26
*** TURN *** [8s 3c 9s] [Qh]
*** RIVER *** [8s 3c 9s Qh] [4s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Z22E2W26 collected $21487 from pot
Z22E2W26: shows [Jh Qd]
PAKP0L13: shows [8h 5c]
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $22152 | Rake $665
Board [8s 3c 9s Qh 4s]
Seat 2: Z22E2W26 (button) showed [Jh Qd] and won ($21487) with One pair, Queen
Seat 3: KIKIFADIL (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: PAKP0L13 (big blind) showed [8h 5c] and lost with One pair, Eight
Seat 5: XZYBIT folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: AZRINA1234 folded on the Flop

I try this:


and try this:



And many other options, but nothing comes of it.

It looks like an obvious bug, but an error on my part cannot be ruled out.

NoteCaddyEdge, can you check this, please?

[NotecaddyEdge]

If I assume this correctly, you're trying to make a postflop definition, where the preflop action must be: note recipient posts BB and checks his option.

If so I would do it this way:
'Player had to be the note recipient' → Post BB
'Player had to NOT be the note recipient' → Call → Player's final action this street

wUL8VWO.png

UFKEA4x.png

[FALOs]

If so I would do it this way:
'Player had to be the note recipient' → Post BB
'Player had to NOT be the note recipient' → Call → Player's final action this street


Thank you very much NotecaddyEdge, this is a really working option. Thanks to you, a solution was found, and I can do what I planned.

I have been familiar with NC for several years, but from time to time I come across a problem that I do not fully understand the logic of the program in some situations.
Therefore, in order not to be just a "parrot" repeating the correct decision after others (you), I want to ask - is your decision based on some clear rules or is it just one of the selected options that turned out to be working?

I really want to understand this so as not to repeat mistakes and not waste your time in future.

In our case, why doesn't work the simplest, at first glance, option Post BB + Player's final action this street? Even if everyone folds before BB, would that make the definition malfunctioning in some cases?

Again, why doesn't work the option as in my second picture? I remember you told me that it is important that in order to exclude any "enemy" action is necessary for the player to perform any action. Post BB - is this action from the programm point of view?

Maybe it makes sense to create some kind of FAQ, where the nuances of program logic that are often encountered and raise questions will be clearly described?

Ty.

[NotecaddyEdge]

If so I would do it this way:
'Player had to be the note recipient' → Post BB
'Player had to NOT be the note recipient' → Call → Player's final action this street


Thank you very much NotecaddyEdge, this is a really working option. Thanks to you, a solution was found, and I can do what I planned.

I have been familiar with NC for several years, but from time to time I come across a problem that I do not fully understand the logic of the program in some situations.
Therefore, in order not to be just a "parrot" repeating the correct decision after others (you), I want to ask - is your decision based on some clear rules or is it just one of the selected options that turned out to be working?

I really want to understand this so as not to repeat mistakes and not waste your time in future.

In our case, why doesn't work the simplest, at first glance, option Post BB + Player's final action this street? Even if everyone folds before BB, would that make the definition malfunctioning in some cases?

Again, why doesn't work the option as in my second picture? I remember you told me that it is important that in order to exclude any "enemy" action is necessary for the player to perform any action. Post BB - is this action from the programm point of view?

Maybe it makes sense to create some kind of FAQ, where the nuances of program logic that are often encountered and raise questions will be clearly described?

Ty.

Hi FALOs,

For the way that you tried it, I thought maybe it would work, but I am just guessing that the reason it didn't is because 'Post BB' was not considered the final action on the street (because the player faces the opportunity to raise or check his option). The 'player's final action on this street' will perhaps only be a success when the player doesn't have an opportunity to take anymore actions.