Is this a Bug? (BB/100 is not Adjusted)
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    1

    Default Is this a Bug? (BB/100 is not Adjusted)

    I had around 59% on the Flop but my 'Adj. BB/100' is acting like i lost the hand on Showdown.
    All 3 Players were 'All-In' on the Flop.

    For me it feels like a bug.





    PokerStars - $0.05 PL Hi FAST (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 6 players
    Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3 : http://www.holdemmanager.com

    BTN: $16.42 (328.4 bb)
    SB: $5.51 (110.2 bb)
    BB: $9.33 (186.6 bb)
    Hero (UTG): $8.16 (163.2 bb)
    MP: $3.36 (67.2 bb)
    CO: $2.22 (44.4 bb)

    SB posts $0.02, BB posts $0.05

    Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has 4h Ad Ah 9d
    Hero raises to $0.17, fold, CO calls $0.17, 2 folds, BB raises to $0.70, Hero raises to $2.29, CO calls $2.05 and is all-in, BB calls $1.59

    Flop: ($6.82, 3 players) 9c Kh Ac
    BB bets $6.55, Hero calls $5.87 and is all-in

    Turn: ($18.56, 3 players) 6s

    River: ($18.56, 3 players) 8c

    Results: $18.56 pot ($0.72 rake)
    Final Board: 9c Kh Ac 6s 8c

    BB shows Kd Td Qc Jc: (Flush, Ace High)
    Main Pot: [$6.68]: (Pre 24%, Flop 32%, Turn 22%)
    Side Pot: [$11.88]: (Pre 30%, Flop 41%, Turn 31%)

    Hero shows 4h Ad Ah 9d: (Three of a Kind, Aces)
    Main Pot: [$6.68]: (Pre 65%, Flop 59%, Turn 69%)
    Side Pot: [$11.88]: (Pre 70%, Flop 59%, Turn 69%)

    CO shows Jd Tc 2c Qd: (Flush, Ace High)
    Main Pot: [$6.68]: (Pre 12%, Flop 9%, Turn 8%)

    BB wins $17.84

  2. #2
    *** HM3! *** fozzy71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HM Support
    Posts
    32,809

    Default

    The CO player was all in preflop. Only 2 players could act on the flop.

    HM3 uses the same equity code as PT4 now which is more accurate and less biased than the code we used for equity in HM2.

    In a hand where a player is all-in but other players are not, net adjusted results are not calculated. When one player is all-in preflop and other players are not, then they usually have the option to act postflop and this means that sometimes one of them will fold. Having the option to fold* after another street is dealt means that in the long run there will be more strong hands which get to showdown and less weak hands. If we were to calculate net adjusted results in hands like this it would introduce a systematic bias (because there will be more known strong hands) so we exclude all hands like this from net adjusted calculations. You can read more about this here - https://www.pokertracker.com/blog/20...-all-in-equity

    *Note: Attempting to calculate adjusted results when unknown but folded cards already called the all-in also introduce a bias into the results so HM3 does not make these calculations in any situation where a player calls the all-in and later folds (even if it's on the same street).

Similar Threads

  1. True bb/100, $ (EV adjusted) with Rakeback, True EV bb/100
    By El_Bandito in forum Feature Requests and Feedback
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-04-2015, 06:25 PM
  2. EV adjusted bb/100 and St.dev. for EV b/100
    By Caruso in forum Feature Requests and Feedback
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-12-2013, 05:06 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-21-2012, 12:06 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-19-2011, 12:51 AM
  5. Alias EV adjusted different from player EV adjusted
    By lonelycube in forum Manager General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-02-2009, 04:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •