Range tab new "Pair/Board" option
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    139

    Default Range tab new "Pair/Board" option

    I have all my old stats with that option unmarked, this means that I have to change all my old stats to count as bluff all the bets with air in Paired boards?

  2. #2
    NoteCaddy sreticentv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    No direction but to trust the final destination
    Posts
    6,481

    Default

    Before that option was added the pair was considered whichever pair was on the board. Unless you considered pairs as bluffs then the definitions should be working as they did before. They can work more accurately by selecting this option for your bluff definitions.
    NoteCaddy Manual | Coaching Packs | Blog
    NoteCaddy experts: a.k.aAlso, Catalyst_Kh, Derders, karstenkloss, scoobediah (NoteCaddy Edge)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sreticentv View Post
    Before that option was added the pair was considered whichever pair was on the board. Unless you considered pairs as bluffs then the definitions should be working as they did before. They can work more accurately by selecting this option for your bluff definitions.
    If the player is making a bet with 67o in TT5 he have a Pair with that option unmarked as bluff in a big % of boards, It is a serious mistake..., a friend told me about that,

    Im going to change hundred of stats to general strenght, I hope you have more careful in the future when you make changes like this, Im going to loose a lot of time because of that.
    Last edited by Rocks_strato; 08-25-2014 at 07:47 AM.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    863

    Default

    If the player is making a bet with 67o in TT5 he have a Pair with that option unmarked
    He always had a pair with that hand, nothing changed to that. Only change is that you can now differentiate for a paired board.

    It is a serious mistake
    It wasn't a mistake, as it's technically correct.

    I hope you have more careful in the future when you make changes like this
    As explained to you there wasn't anything uncareful about the change.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HossendeHaai View Post
    He always had a pair with that hand, nothing changed to that. Only change is that you can now differentiate for a paired board.
    No, he have "7 high", when you go to a casino yo play poker and you show your cards in that hand you have "7 high" and you have a Bluff, now all my stats interpret that situations as Value and my stats are corrupted and obviously I'm not happy to have to spend a lot of hours to fix this.

    I had noticed that my bluff stats ​​were not giving correct values and now I understand the reason, this change not makes sense, no way.
    Last edited by Rocks_strato; 08-25-2014 at 07:29 PM.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sreticentv View Post
    Before that option was added the pair was considered whichever pair was on the board. Unless you considered pairs as bluffs then the definitions should be working as they did before.
    Quote Originally Posted by HossendeHaai View Post
    He always had a pair with that hand, nothing changed to that. Only change is that you can now differentiate for a paired board.
    What part of THIS DIDN'T CHANGE don't you understand?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HossendeHaai View Post
    What part of THIS DIDN'T CHANGE don't you understand?
    Right now i make new copys of some bluff stats with that option marked as bluff and i have 12% bluffs more in the general stats.

    In the bet river general bluff % the difference is even greater.

    All my stats are corrupted with this option unmarked, before was different, all was working well, and i didnt consider "pair" as bluff before, the values are different now.

    Im agree that now you can differenciate for a paired board, but in the proccess you have fucked all my old stats and you respond arrogantly above...
    Last edited by Rocks_strato; 08-25-2014 at 09:14 PM.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    863

    Default

    To be clear: I'm just a forum user.

    All my stats are corrupted with this option unmarked, before was different, all was working well, and i didnt consider "pair" as bluff before, the values are different now.
    As said 3 times already: before a pair on the board was considered a pair in the players handrange as it is now without changing the defs. So nothing got corrupted. You can argue it was corrupted already, but that's not very relevant anymore anyway.

    Not gonna respond anymore, you just seem to want to vent your frustration. I have no solution for that.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-06-2014, 12:47 PM
  2. Flush draw on the turn missing in "Board Texture" filters
    By punter11235 in forum Bug Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-01-2013, 03:38 PM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-02-2012, 06:16 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-18-2011, 09:14 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-14-2010, 07:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •