Huge runtime difference between IP and OOP note
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    114

    Default Huge runtime difference between IP and OOP note

    I have made the following notes:
    Delayed_cb_fold_vs_checkraise
    Delayed_cb_fold_vs_raise

    when I looked through my DB today I saw that the delayed cb vs raise had approximately 9x the runtime of the checkraise version even though it has fewer total instances.

    I made a test database and reimported them and got this:
    vs check raise: 17/36 (738 runtime)
    vs raise: 4/8 (6196 runtime)

    I have looked through the definitions and I cant find any difference besided that fold vs cr has a check before the best, raise, fold... (which I assume would cause more runtime).

    I have looked through a lot of other notes and OOP notes all have much higher total runtime, why is this?
    (In all my notes I only select IP or OOP at flop)



    Best regards,
    Mattias

  2. #2
    NoteCaddy sreticentv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    No direction but to trust the final destination
    Posts
    6,481

    Default

    Sorry I don't know
    NoteCaddy Manual | Coaching Packs | Blog
    NoteCaddy experts: a.k.aAlso, Catalyst_Kh, Derders, karstenkloss, scoobediah (NoteCaddy Edge)

Similar Threads

  1. huge difference in space used
    By laurensds in forum General Support
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-17-2013, 09:48 PM
  2. Runtime error
    By mousebreaker in forum Manager General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-06-2010, 01:44 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-29-2009, 11:36 PM
  4. New HM / Runtime error on EVP.
    By PkrPoen in forum Manager General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-28-2008, 02:05 PM
  5. Runtime Error
    By john2 in forum Manager General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-22-2008, 04:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •