AFq stats are wrong!!

[tigerjack89]

Hey there.
Your AFq stats are completely wrong. I'm using HEM1, but I think the problem is the same for HEM2 because I know that the stats are implemented in the same way.
I filtered for today hands where I bet/fold the flop, here the result. Do you see my point?

statsfb.jpg

[tigerjack89]

Point is:
"That's a lot of folding for 100% aggression!!!"
DUCY??

[Patvs]

Read: http://forums.holdemmanager.com/mana...ercentage.html

I think there's a conflict with the filter you're using resulting in the wrong AFq. As a test, can you add AFq as a HUD stat to your HUD, and check if the AFq then looks normal.

[tigerjack89]

I still have the AFq in the HUD; btw, from the formulas in your link, it seems that HEM doesn't take into account folds into the AFq stats, am I right?

So, AFq is not
(Bets + Raises) / (Bets + Raises + Calls + Checks + Folds) but just
(Bets + Raises) / (Bets + Raises + Calls + Checks)
right? Why a check is considered as a "passive" action while a fold as a "neutral" action?

[filipjuan]

(Raise+Bet)/(Raise+Bet+Call+Fold+Check)*100
wtf? i have ever known that this is the correct formula????

[tigerjack89]

(Raise+Bet)/(Raise+Bet+Call+Fold+Check)*100
wtf? i have ever known that this is the correct formula????

Me too, but it seems that we made bad assumptions. And it seems at least... LOL.

[Patvs]

Yes, you're right. It seems
AFq is not
(Bets + Raises) / (Bets + Raises + Calls + Checks + Folds) but
(Bets + Raises) / (Bets + Raises + Calls + Checks)

[tigerjack89]

Yes, you're right. It seems
AFq is not
(Bets + Raises) / (Bets + Raises + Calls + Checks + Folds) but
(Bets + Raises) / (Bets + Raises + Calls + Checks)

Do you think the formula will be changed or remain the same?

[udbrky]

It should not change in the foreseeable future.

[tigerjack89]

It should not change in the foreseeable future.

Why?? Don't you think is a wrong way to proceed?