Why do so many people say the comparison of EVbb/100 v bb/100 for AIPF coin flips in tournaments is wrong? Really fail to see how such a simple sum could be wrong?
Why do so many people say the comparison of EVbb/100 v bb/100 for AIPF coin flips in tournaments is wrong? Really fail to see how such a simple sum could be wrong?
Last edited by RunBad4Life; 09-07-2012 at 01:49 PM.
Most of the recent noise about Tourney EV on the forums is because there are some problems with the tourney detection of some pokerstars hypers which is causing the EV to be calculated incorrectly.
yeh im not takling about STT's or redlines. I'm talking about bb/100 in the reports....MTT SnG's included
Last edited by RunBad4Life; 09-07-2012 at 08:07 PM.
I guess I don't understand what you are saying/asking. Can you give a specific example or attach a hand.
EV is never calculated in MTT's...MTT SnG's included
http://forums.holdemmanager.com/mana...ituations.html
What I am saying is extremely simple. reports, set filter to all in on the flop, bb/100, EVbb/100...the difference between the two. Correct or not, if not, why not?
It should be accurate for SNGs, unless you are playing on Pokerstars. There are some known bugs we have been working on with the results and EV for stars tourneys (Hypers in particular). The thread about the stars issue is here - http://forums.holdemmanager.com/mana...pers-6max.html
Here is a link to the latest HM1 internal build - - http://forums.holdemmanager.com/gene...uncements.html
Please download it and create a new database, then import a sample of recent hands. If you find any EV discrepancies for specific hands you want us to investigate please zip and email the problem hand histories, with a link to this thread and your forum name, to support@holdemmanager.com