Action Sequence question

[Olaf]

sreticentv, Please explain, your Action Sequence conceived to replace the old system of action, or this is a simplified system for the only simple steps?
Maybe I do not understand it well, but in this case, Prompt, as in the Action Sequence to make analogues of the functions like Open raise/Call 3N Bet, Cold Call raise/call 3N Bet, Cold Call/4Bet, if i want to forbid this action in 4Bet defs?

For a better understanding of:

UTG raise, MP 3Bet, CO 4BET - i don't want to allow UTG call 4Bet, so i need to forbid Open raise/Call 3N Bet and other similar actions. Other example - limp/Call 3Bet action, if i want to allow limp, but don't want to allow call 3Bet for this limper, only fo PR, etc- can i do it such kind of action via Action Sequence logic?

[sreticentv]

Action sequences are conceived to replace the actions tab. Using multiple sequences works as OR conditions so you should be able to model anything. Please see Filtering player actions - Assaultware Wiki for more details

[Olaf]

sreticentv, unfortunately need a little help

Let's start:

Action Sequences: 3BET

Actions:
1) Enemy Raise - (NOT note recipient, Raise)
2) No Cold Call - (NOT note recipient, Call, Action had to NOT happen) - exclude Squize possibility for 3Bet.
3) 3BET - (note recipient , Raise, Player's final action this street)

So, now we have a standard template for a 3bet pot.

And now that I do not understand:
How to forbid
1) Limp/Call 3Bet - if i don't want to forbid limp, only limp/call!
2) Cold Call 3Bet

You advice use multiple sequence, because they work as "OR" logic.
But, please, give there a small example, so i can understand better, how i can forbid this actions and better understand how to work with multiple action sequences in general.

Maybe you should add a similar example in Wikia?
And it would be cool if you made Sticky, which would be reported on updates to Wikia - to get the latest information.

TY.

[sreticentv]

You can put an "action had to not happen" after the 3 bet in the sequence. Recommended is to make the 2 bet the final action though as you mentioned. Yes, multiple sequences work as OR so not relevant to this query

[Olaf]

Eeeeeeeeeerrr..........

Well, look:

***** History for hand R5-250145753-480 *****
Start hand: Wed Jun 20 08:46:00 GMT-0910 2012
Table: Gainesville [250145753] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM $0.50/$1, Real money)
Button: seat 8
Players in round: 6
Seat 3: callnlose ($265.63)
Seat 4: bazaman_x ($100.00)
Seat 5: Nexus_71 ($103.50)
Seat 6: acqabz. ($190.43)
Seat 7: Viva_Juve ($100.00)
Seat 8: Galax1an ($75.53)
callnlose posts small blind ($0.50)
bazaman_x posts big blind ($1)
---
Dealing pocket cards
Nexus_71 raises $3.00 to $3.00
acqabz. folds
Viva_Juve folds
Galax1an folds
callnlose raises $9.50 to $10.00
bazaman_x calls $9.00
Nexus_71 folds
--- Dealing flop [4c, 5h, 7c]
callnlose checks
bazaman_x bets $6.00
callnlose raises $28.00 to $28.00
bazaman_x folds
---
Summary:
Main pot: $35.00 won by callnlose ($33.25)
Rake taken: $1.75
Seat 3: callnlose ($282.88), net: +$17.25
Seat 4: bazaman_x ($84.00), net: -$16.00
Seat 5: Nexus_71 ($100.50), net: -$3.00
Seat 6: acqabz. ($190.43), net: -$00
Seat 7: Viva_Juve ($100.00), net: -$00
Seat 8: Galax1an ($75.53), net: -$00
***** End of hand R5-250145753-480 *****

Do you see bazaman_x?

That bastard made Cold Call 3Bet, but such type of hands should not be considered.
With that I still have problems, I'm sorry.
Most of all, I do not fully understand your advice, but my attempts to follow it did not lead to the expected result.

Therefore, I am sending you a template 3BET def., add there the necessary corrective action, please, to avoid Limp and then Call 3Bet, and Cold Call 3Bet, Please!!

[sreticentv]

Something doesn't compute. You said avoid limp/call but in the hand you posted nobody limped.

[Olaf]

Something doesn't compute. You said avoid limp/call but in the hand you posted nobody limped.

I mean, that in addition to Cold call 3Bet should be banned limp/call 3Bet also.

Of course, you can only show, how to avoid Cold Call 3Bet, as in hand, which i was posted there.
Avoid limp/call - only as an additional request, for the corresponding situations which will meet during the execution the same definition.

For your better understanding:
Now i use Action Sequence 3B template, which i send to you + This:

1.png

But, you say that Action sequences are conceived to replace the actions tab at all! So, i want to do that!

[sreticentv]

If you can't do it with an action sequence then use the old system. Sequences cover what every user besides you wants to do and are much easier to understand