Guess what kids? That's right - another bug - effective stack / flop SPR

[Stasek]

So I wanted to see hands in 3bet pot where hero raised cbet, but with effective stack at leat 70bb (or kinda-equivalent SPR > 3).

Effective stack > 70 still returned hand where 20bb villain 3bet PF.
SPR > 3 - same hand included, because it only checks hero flop SPR.

Do you people understand what effective stack really means? Or SPR?
It does'nt matter that hero has SPR>3 if villain has SPR = 0.5.
Same for the effective stack - only lower value matters.

This is true for HU pots.
In multiway pots definitions start losing their meaning.

I'm not sending any hands btw. Too tired of doing this constantly.

[DogNamedBluff]

I have forwarded this issue to our bugs department for further investigation. It will be tested in the order in which it was received. We will reply back in this thread with our findings.

[DogNamedBluff]

These issues have been tested, duplicated, documented in detail and provided to the developers to resolve. While I do not have a specific date for when this issue will be resolved, we are putting out updates regularly.

The assigned internal ticket #'s on this issue is HM-4859 and HM-4860. We will often release builds on a limited basis, only in the forums, for a few days first. Please check back on this thread http://forums.holdemmanager.com/hm2-releases/ for that ticket #.

[random]

Hello Stasek,

We went through a lot of samples, but were unable to find any problematic hands.

In multiway pots, all remaining stacks are counted. That means that effective stack could be bigger then what 3better had, because of one of the remaining players had more chips.

If you find any problematic hand histories, please attach them and we will get it fixed asap.

[Stasek]

If 2 players see the flop then effective stack should be defined as minimum of relevant stacks
If 3+, then it should also be defined as minimum.
The concept of effective stack gets blurry with 3+ players involved, but i believe the "minimum" definition is closest to the ideal.

SPR should be treated the same.
I think SPR is also wrong if only 2 playesr see the flop, but i dont remember.