Definition question

[melles]

I want to make a definition of btn, co coldcalling vs utg, mp open raise.

I made a preflop previous action that open limp and Coldcall action had to not happen.

But when utg limp, mp isolate it still say the btn and co are candidates. They should NOT be candidates here when there have been a limp infront.

[sreticentv]

The thing is that the previous actions need to be in order so you would need a third previous action saying "no limp" prior to the open raise. That didn't used to always be like that but it presented some limitations.

It will be annoying now you have to add the limp as the first action but starting in 2.3 there will be arrows to shift previous actions to make it easier

[melles]

Thanks that explains a lot, I even tried with a 3rd action no limp but it was never in order.

You should make a thread were you post NC release notes just as the HM2 release thread.

Before HM2 you had a thread like that on Assaultware - Notecaddy but its gone.

Its important to know about changes like this that can effect our definitions I might have a bunch of definitions that doesnt work now.

[sreticentv]

Thanks that explains a lot, I even tried with a 3rd action no limp but it was never in order.

You should make a thread were you post NC release notes just as the HM2 release thread.

Minor Release notes

Its important to know about changes like this that can effect our definitions I might have a bunch of definitions that doesnt work now.

You're right and every effort is made not to break existing definitions but in this particular case I was damned if I did and damned if I didn't