lol what a huge mistake it was to add the implicits functionality. Maybe 5 people use it and it's a massive pain in the ass to get working for all scenarios
lol what a huge mistake it was to add the implicits functionality. Maybe 5 people use it and it's a massive pain in the ass to get working for all scenarios
Cry of the soul? This feature actually uses so few people? This is greatOriginally Posted by sreticentv
lol what a huge mistake it was to add the implicits functionality. Maybe 5 people use it and it's a massive pain in the ass to get working for all scenariosBut frankly - weird. Why? It's a great idea!
Do not despair. Just once came over a lot of problems - but it's not forever
Not true at all. this is arguably the best feature and absolutely all the top NC users use it.Maybe 5 people use it
Last edited by nilaynilay; 01-21-2012 at 06:57 PM.
Do not even joke like that! This feature makes the tons of useful information!
This is a complex branching system?to get working for all scenarios
It looks like - yes, as in one and the same Def. i recieve SUCCESS {Implicit Strength} - that is true,
Immediately Opportunity - which is not true. Must to Be Success {Implicit Strength}
Flop Range is set.
1) SUCCESS - that is true: HateMeeAgain me shown aggression and won without SD.
***** History for hand R5-189020211-116 *****
Start hand: Fri Nov 04 10:11:00 GMT 2011
Table: Chicago [189020211] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM $0.50/$1, Real money)
Button: seat 3
Players in Round: 6
Seat 2: goldbaer1975 ($77.56)
Seat 3: lourk ($120.29)
Seat 4: rabbyday ($101.36)
Seat 5: TrudiTrouble ($100.0)
Seat 9: altous1 ($156.11)
Seat 10: HateMeeAgain ($99.5)
rabbyday posts small blind ($0.50)
TrudiTrouble posts big blind ($1)
---
Dealing pocket cards
altous1 calls $1.0
HateMeeAgain raises $3.0 to $3.0
goldbaer1975 folds
lourk folds
rabbyday folds
TrudiTrouble folds
altous1 calls $2.0
--- Dealing flop [Kh, 3d, 9c]
altous1 checks
HateMeeAgain checks
--- Dealing turn [2s]
altous1 bets $5.5
HateMeeAgain raises $15.0 to $15.0
altous1 folds
---
Summary:
Main pot: $18.5 won by HateMeeAgain ($17.58)
Seat 2: goldbaer1975 ($77.56), net: -$0
Seat 3: lourk ($120.29), net: -$0
Seat 4: rabbyday ($100.86), net: -$0.5
Seat 5: TrudiTrouble ($99.0), net: -$1.0
Seat 9: altous1 ($147.61), net: -$8.5
Seat 10: HateMeeAgain ($108.58), net: +$9.08
***** End of hand R5-189020211-116 *****
2) OPPORTUNITY - that is untrue: HateMeeAgain me shown aggression and won without SD AGAIN
Possible reason for the error lies in the fact that the opponent was trying to seize the initiative and NC do not recognize it?
***** History for hand R5-190377841-110 *****
Start hand: Wed Nov 09 03:06:00 GMT 2011
Table: Omdurman [190377841] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM $0.50/$1, Real money)
Button: seat 9
Players in Round: 6
Seat 4: Pokeroneone ($187.85)
Seat 5: w4stemyh4te ($255.77)
Seat 6: Chefstrich ($100.0)
Seat 7: HateMeeAgain ($100.0)
Seat 8: kodakske ($35.0)
Seat 9: anlink8750 ($40.48)
Pokeroneone posts small blind ($0.50)
w4stemyh4te posts big blind ($1)
kodakske posts big blind ($1)
---
Dealing pocket cards
Chefstrich folds
HateMeeAgain raises $4.0 to $4.0
kodakske folds
anlink8750 folds
Pokeroneone calls $3.5
w4stemyh4te folds
--- Dealing flop [Kc, 9c, 8h]
Pokeroneone checks
HateMeeAgain checks
--- Dealing turn [4h]
Pokeroneone bets $4.0
HateMeeAgain raises $16.0 to $16.0
Pokeroneone calls $12.0
--- Dealing river [3h]
Pokeroneone bets $35.0
HateMeeAgain raises $80.0 to $80.0 [all in]
Pokeroneone folds
---
Summary:
Main pot: $112 won by HateMeeAgain ($109)
Seat 4: Pokeroneone ($132.85), net: -$55.0
Seat 5: w4stemyh4te ($254.77), net: -$1.0
Seat 6: Chefstrich ($100.0), net: -$0
Seat 7: HateMeeAgain ($154.0), net: +$54.0
Seat 8: kodakske ($34.0), net: -$1.0
Seat 9: anlink8750 ($40.48), net: -$0
***** End of hand R5-190377841-110 *****
Last edited by Olaf; 01-21-2012 at 08:10 PM.
Guys, there is some progress? Become too quiet now
Patches are usually released Fridays and this will be addressed for tomorrow's release
Hello Guys, now I have a little time to test your changes in 2.2.2.6!
Page 1 and 2 - Great work, problems have been fixed, thanks!
Page 3, my post #25, paragraph 2 - the problem remains!
And something new
I expect Opportunity in this hand, but Test show me Incorrect River hand.
This is serious problem, because NC don't calculate any River Hands with Implicit Weakness in this case
***** History for hand R5-191063533-595 *****
Start hand: Sat Nov 12 02:25:00 GMT 2011
Table: Baton Rouge [191063533] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM $0.50/$1, Real money)
Button: seat 7
Players in Round: 5
Seat 3: Fodurrr ($56.81)
Seat 7: Lorgy1 ($244.51)
Seat 8: HateMeeAgain ($100.0)
Seat 9: CardLadyF ($154.74)
Seat 10: El.Pescador. ($105.63)
HateMeeAgain posts small blind ($0.50)
CardLadyF posts big blind ($1)
---
Dealing pocket cards
El.Pescador. folds
Fodurrr folds
Lorgy1 folds
HateMeeAgain raises $2.5 to $3.0
CardLadyF calls $2.0
--- Dealing flop [2h, 8s, Ts]
HateMeeAgain bets $4.5
CardLadyF calls $4.5
--- Dealing turn [7c]
HateMeeAgain bets $11.5
CardLadyF calls $11.5
--- Dealing river [6c]
HateMeeAgain bets $22.0
CardLadyF raises $135.74 to $135.74 [all in]
HateMeeAgain folds
---
Summary:
Main pot: $82 won by CardLadyF ($79)
Seat 3: Fodurrr ($56.81), net: -$0
Seat 7: Lorgy1 ($244.51), net: -$0
Seat 8: HateMeeAgain ($59.0), net: -$41.0
Seat 9: CardLadyF ($192.74), net: +$38.0
Seat 10: El.Pescador. ($105.63), net: -$0
***** End of hand R5-191063533-595 *****
River_HALF_POT_BET_STRONG!.xml
Thank you I will look into it
how do i get 2.2.2.6, as each link i find is 2.2.2.3
Posting Permissions
