Define opportunities by range - bug?(BW)

[Olaf]

Let me get some clarification here. Who is supposed to get a note and is it supposed to be a success or opportunity?

I see hatemeeagain could potentially get a missed opportunity but in the OP you said it gave you "invalid turn" which is not what I'm getting

Sorrry for this - of course "Incorrect flop hand"
I wait missed opportunity "Implicit weaknes" for hatemeeagain

[sreticentv]

in that case indeed it's problem

2.2.2.4 is coming in 8-9 hours though

[nilaynilay]

in the hand olaf posted hateme folds to pressure. it is a success for implicit weakness and thats what is seen in test enviroment if the weakness box is ticked

now if olaf is saying that when he ticks the strength box and it shows in correct turn hand instead of a opportunity then i can understand else i donot follow.

Edit: i double checked and it is this

when he ticks the strength box and it shows in correct turn hand instead of a opportunity

[Olaf]

in the hand olaf posted hateme folds to pressure. it is a success for implicit weakness and thats what is seen in test enviroment if the weakness box is ticked

now if olaf is saying that when he ticks the strength box and it shows in correct turn hand instead of a opportunity then i can understand else i donot follow.

Edit: i double checked and it is this

Nilaynilay, ask Sreti about this. Apparently, I brought you into confusion with "turn hand". Of course I meant Flop hand.

[Olaf]

in that case indeed it's problem

2.2.2.4 is coming in 8-9 hours though

Sreti, You were quick with this version


Take my def from first post and test with this hands:



1) SEEK - Opportunity - incorrect flop hand??? Test show Candidate

My def work with "Define opp. with range", so, why i see this hand? : No ShowDown, No Implicit.



***** History for hand R5-190563532-334 *****
Start hand: Thu Nov 10 02:26:00 GMT 2011
Table: Odense [190563532] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM $0.50/$1, Real money)
Button: seat 7
Players in Round: 6
Seat 3: stinka1 ($48.5)
Seat 5: ezartl ($196.7)
Seat 6: Lacoste5 ($271.08)
Seat 7: 2pac187CPT ($109.83)
Seat 8: HateMeeAgain ($119.38)
Seat 10: zak_moglis ($116.71)
HateMeeAgain posts small blind ($0.50)
zak_moglis posts big blind ($1)
---
Dealing pocket cards
stinka1 folds
ezartl folds
Lacoste5 folds
2pac187CPT folds
HateMeeAgain raises $2.5 to $3.0
zak_moglis calls $2.0
--- Dealing flop [Kh, 9h, 3h]
HateMeeAgain bets $6.0
zak_moglis folds
---
Summary:
Main pot: $6 won by HateMeeAgain ($5.7)
Seat 3: stinka1 ($48.5), net: -$0
Seat 5: ezartl ($196.7), net: -$0
Seat 6: Lacoste5 ($271.08), net: -$0
Seat 7: 2pac187CPT ($109.83), net: -$0
Seat 8: HateMeeAgain ($122.08), net: +$2.7
Seat 10: zak_moglis ($113.71), net: -$3.0
***** End of hand R5-190563532-334 *****


2) Resolved - my fault.




3) What happened with Definition Drag and Drop featchure?
She has worked in version 2.2.2.3, but with glitches. Now, she work only for "Start" Tab.

[sreticentv]

Thank you olaf. I will look at this more closely later

3) What happened with Definition Drag and Drop featchure?
She has worked in version 2.2.2.3, but with glitches. Now, she work only for "Start" Tab.

The UI is based on third party controls and as you say it had some glitches which I am helpless to solve. I had to remove the feature since there were many support requests coming in and without some support reductions this software can't get new features

[Olaf]

Ty Sreti.

I understand that right now you have serious headache with restarting notes creation in HM2, but do not forget that incorrect/ incomplete results are not less harmful than their absence. If possible, do not tighten with General Strength and Implicit problems.

[nilaynilay]

Cliffs:
There is a bug with implicit strength. i am going to write this up.

hand1 is a bug with strength. this should be a success with implicit strength but it says incorrect flop hand-candidate.

implicit weakness says incorrect flop hand. this is correct as player didnt have any chance to show weakness as he didnt face a bet or raise.

hand2 not a bug. if you specify strength it says incorrect flop hands * candidate*. I guess you missed the candidate part.
this means its a missed opportunity. the flop hand is incorrect as he didnt show strength. and its a candidate as he could have shown it .

if you specify weakness it works correctly as success.

[Olaf]

Cliffs:
There is a bug with implicit strength. i am going to write this up.

hand1 is a bug with strength. this should be a success with implicit strength but it says incorrect flop hand-candidate.

implicit weakness says incorrect flop hand. this is correct as player didnt have any chance to show weakness as he didnt face a bet or raise.

hand2 not a bug. if you specify strength it says incorrect flop hands * candidate*. I guess you missed the candidate part.
this means its a missed opportunity. the flop hand is incorrect as he didnt show strength. and its a candidate as he could have shown it .

if you specify weakness it works correctly as success.

You are right about hand2 - This is Opportunity, so I should not see {implicit weaknes} - my fault.

But explain to the hand1?
HERO CB, Opponent instant fold. but you write "this should be a success with implicit strength". There was no "continuing to show agression" Like CB > Call > CB > Opponent Fold, or CB > Raise > Hero Reraise > Opponent fold. So, no Success, no opport. in this case (Def. opportun. by range) - I'm right?

[nilaynilay]

HERO CB, Opponent instant fold. but you write "this should be a success with implicit strength". There was no "continuing to show agression" Like CB > Call > CB > Opponent Fold, or CB > Raise > Hero Reraise > Opponent fold. So, no Success, no opport. in this case (Def. opportun. by range) - I'm right?

This is for Sreti to clarify. You maybe be right here. the cbet was his first action the flop. so he did win the pot without showdown. but we defined implicit on the flop and this was his first action. since villain folded we can argue he didnt get any chance to show aggression

I understand the point you are making. This comes down to the way its defined. Once that is clarified i can change the bug report.