Originally Posted by
Pure Presence
Just thought about it some more and I think this is better: Assume you log 100 hands/table/hour. If you 1-table for 4 hours and then 10-table for 1 hour, you now get an overall MT ratio of (4*1 + 1*10)/(1+4) = 2.8. But what you want is (400 * 1 + 1000 * 10)/(1000+400) = 7.43, because most of your hands were played while playing 10 tables. I.e. in practice one would like the hands to be the time parameter, not the clock time (because the standard winrate dimension is bb/100 hands, not bb/hour, so if you calculate MT ratio in the usual way you can't make a meaningful winrate comparison).
NB. I haven't actually checked if the current situation is as I said, just deduced it from your post.