thanks
Type: Posts; User: Rapala
thanks
Oh I see. My problem is with microgaming because all hands are stored in a single DB file and processed hands are not stored anywhere. To make autoimporting faster I have set only 100 hands to be...
It would be nice if HM2 could read pt4 format hand exports. You might say it's not necessary but pt4 has gone to the trouble to recognise HM2 exports. I have long detailed reason why I need this...
Hooray!
k thanks
The old thread seems to have disappeared so i guess I will use this one. I have 5 days left of my trial for the program that does support truepoker. I just want to check that there is no reason for...
Great news, thank you :)
I second this idea. Too often i forget to do things like this, so a daily prompt asking if you'd like to sync would be great. If HM is closed at the scheduled time then it could popup a window on...
Please add the following checkboxes in the 'range' tab so that we can more easily specify the nuts.
'nut straight - no flush possible or paired board
'Nut flush - board not paired'
Yeh I understand, but the 81 hand we are delighted to check raise it all in, whereas the 86 hand is a check call at best (in PLO) depending on action. i will post in the feature request thread.
In HM1 I liked the feature of coping a hand to clipboard as rich text, as then I would make documents of interesting hands and my analysis. Now it seems all we have is plain text and bunch of forum...
Please could you explain how to do this. I made the first action which is check. Then I made a second action but there is still only check or bet as options, no call option.
I did some experimentation using the test function and found some problems.
eg: Ks Kc on Kd Qc 2c 3h is the stone cold nuts and gets a score of 81.
Kd 5d on Qd Td 2c 3d is the second nuts and...
Is there a way to specify the nuts itself? I know I can specify big hands like top set, nut flush etc but obviously there is a big difference between top set on K72 and KQJ. Reason i ask is I want...
Hi,
I had a situation last week where I had to terminate the HM2 process because the application wouldn't close normally. Since then the startup process has been erratic sometimes working ok, but...
That's very exciting indeed since the decreased performance vs HM1 has greatly detracted from the whole HM2 experience.
ok, I think I'm noticing it because I was using 6866 before.
In Holdem it's a very useful exercise to have a look at your database and see how you are doing in a certain spot eg: opening from the button and looking at the hole cards report to see how...
+1 awesome! Also am i imagining it or is the startup time significantly reduced? The loading hands seemed to go much faster after the update.
Really disappointing after we have been lead to believe it's 'just around the corner' for months. Does this mean it might be next year or even 'never'. ?
NVM, I clearly wasn't looking hard enough for the appropriate tutorial. :o Found it now.
I don't really understand the criteria for a badge to appear. Does it depend on the variable in the description? eg I have 'My note $successversusaverage' in the decription which I as I understand...
Any indication whether the August deadline will be met? I know Winning poker is still a minor network but if you look on Pokerscout, you will see their numbers are growing rapidly. Their 24 hour...
In a nutshell, it's really really slow! (and I do have a high end computer that runs modern games)
Here are some comparisons:
Load program and start playing:
HM1 - 15 seconds
HM2 - 2...
awesome! Got it working and so happy to be able to go back to HM1. (happy to share why I and all my friends hate HM2 devs...)