-
HT 6max satellites $ev
Hello, the current HM1 version does not recognize payouts structure/winnings of HT 6max satellites i play (3-12$ limits) and evlog.txt file says that 65/35 payout structure is used there for ICM calculations instead of 50/50, i use custom 50/50 payout tag in HM2 and winnings are shown correctly there but $ev in HM2 matches $ev in HM1 exactly for those tourneys, the question is if $ev is calculated correct or wrong in both programs?
-
What types of satellites are these?
6max game where 1th and 2th place win a ticket?
3th place win nothing, not even a couple of cents?
Email us a handhistory file + matching summary file of a game to support@holdemmanager.com
with a link to this thread.
-
I suspect currently both HM1 and HM2 use the wrong 65/35 structure for the ICM calculations.
-
There are few cents for the 3rd place, eg 3.68+0.07 buyin prizes are 11.00-11.00-0.08, hh have been sent.
-
Will this be considered for fixing? 8167 hm2 update made no difference, tourney handhistories get imported as 65/35, importing summaries simply ads/deducts the difference from $ev without recalculating $ev using new payouts.
-
Yes, we will fix it for HM2 if you send us some HH and TS files. It will not get fixed for HM1.
Please zip and email the problem hand histories, with a link to this thread and your forum name, to hm2support@holdemmanager.com
All original hands that are auto-imported get moved to an archive for performance reasons. Your \HM2Archive is in C:\HM2Archive by default, but you may have put it anywhere. The archive should be organized by \Month\DayOfMonth (example: D:\HM2Archive\2009\07\31) or if it was auto-imported with 7283+ it would be in \HM2Archive\SiteName\YYYY\MM\DD.
When sending any hand history files please zip them (right-click > send to > compressed folder) before attaching them to an email. If the attachment is too big to attach to an email please upload them to a file hosting site like dropbox or filedropper and send us the download link. or filedropper and send us the download link.
-
Any news on this? The fix is about applying 50/50 structure by default for the specified buyin+rake, it works correctly for the single limit for me - $2.96+0.04.
-
This was written up as bugticket HM-8497.
I have no eta when this will be fixed. I've added your email address to the bug ticket, so you'll be automatically notified when it is fixed