#Losers - why winrate, not $won?

[Kerith]

Currently, the #Losers column seems to count the number of players with a negative bb/100 at the table (btw. is bb/100 here big blinds/100?) and not the number of players with a negative $won. I am interested in the reasoning and whether you will add a second #Losers column for $won or let us chose in the settings what to count.

[Mr_Snood]

Well the bb/100 is more reliable I suppose.

Taking "$won" would lead to distortions when players switch the stake a lot.

[Kerith]

Switching stakes a lot causes a distortion either way. If my opponent is winning at a lower stake but losing at higher stakes, would he not be marked a winner altough he probably has leaks and I would not mind playing him at the stakes in question?
I can undestand your reasoning but really would prefer to have a choice or better yet, be displayed both.