CJSaunders
03-09-2009, 12:16 PM
Hi,
I'm posting in "Manager General" because I don't know if that is a bug or not.
I've started importing manually some HH of 2-table SNGs on Pokerstars, and it does not seem to detect correctly the size of the field (that is, 18). Actually when you bust on your first table it shows 9, while if you get to the FT it will show 18. Some more tourneys have weird sizes between 9 and 18. I'm guessing that HEM tries to deduce the size of the field from the number of times you have been moved to another table, which could explain the tourney sizes like 14 (meaning you have been moved to the other table for rebalancing when you were 7 left at your first table or something ?).
More insight on how this is handled ?
Is there a way to get this sorted manually ? Possibly mass-editing at once the tournament properties of all the tourneys with incorrect size ?
And more importantly, does this happen when you are auto-importing while playing, or everything goes smoothly and the field size is always correct ?
Thanks,
EDIT: I forgot to mention I was using 1.08 beta 5.
I'm posting in "Manager General" because I don't know if that is a bug or not.
I've started importing manually some HH of 2-table SNGs on Pokerstars, and it does not seem to detect correctly the size of the field (that is, 18). Actually when you bust on your first table it shows 9, while if you get to the FT it will show 18. Some more tourneys have weird sizes between 9 and 18. I'm guessing that HEM tries to deduce the size of the field from the number of times you have been moved to another table, which could explain the tourney sizes like 14 (meaning you have been moved to the other table for rebalancing when you were 7 left at your first table or something ?).
More insight on how this is handled ?
Is there a way to get this sorted manually ? Possibly mass-editing at once the tournament properties of all the tourneys with incorrect size ?
And more importantly, does this happen when you are auto-importing while playing, or everything goes smoothly and the field size is always correct ?
Thanks,
EDIT: I forgot to mention I was using 1.08 beta 5.