Matjo
07-01-2014, 11:22 AM
I have made the following notes:
Delayed_cb_fold_vs_checkraise
Delayed_cb_fold_vs_raise
when I looked through my DB today I saw that the delayed cb vs raise had approximately 9x the runtime of the checkraise version even though it has fewer total instances.
I made a test database and reimported them and got this:
vs check raise: 17/36 (738 runtime)
vs raise: 4/8 (6196 runtime)
I have looked through the definitions and I cant find any difference besided that fold vs cr has a check before the best, raise, fold... (which I assume would cause more runtime).
I have looked through a lot of other notes and OOP notes all have much higher total runtime, why is this?
(In all my notes I only select IP or OOP at flop)
Best regards,
Mattias
Delayed_cb_fold_vs_checkraise
Delayed_cb_fold_vs_raise
when I looked through my DB today I saw that the delayed cb vs raise had approximately 9x the runtime of the checkraise version even though it has fewer total instances.
I made a test database and reimported them and got this:
vs check raise: 17/36 (738 runtime)
vs raise: 4/8 (6196 runtime)
I have looked through the definitions and I cant find any difference besided that fold vs cr has a check before the best, raise, fold... (which I assume would cause more runtime).
I have looked through a lot of other notes and OOP notes all have much higher total runtime, why is this?
(In all my notes I only select IP or OOP at flop)
Best regards,
Mattias