Talking Poker
01-28-2011, 02:41 AM
I posted this elsewhere in a thread about CAP NL, but figured it should have it's own thread...
Is there a reason why 6 max, HU, and FR are all lumped together under 1 stake, instead of split out? (I know 6 max and FR are - unsure about HU as I don't play it).
ie, instead of everything being lumped into $100 NL, could you split it into some or all of the following stake levels:
$100 NL
$100 NL 6 max
$100 CAP NL
$100 CAP NL 6 max
(and the HU ones, if they aren't already)
I've never understood why 6 max and FR are lumped together, as that kind of ruins any sort of statistical analysis you'd want to do without getting into all kinds of filtering. They are different games and should be treated as such.
Thanks.
Is there a reason why 6 max, HU, and FR are all lumped together under 1 stake, instead of split out? (I know 6 max and FR are - unsure about HU as I don't play it).
ie, instead of everything being lumped into $100 NL, could you split it into some or all of the following stake levels:
$100 NL
$100 NL 6 max
$100 CAP NL
$100 CAP NL 6 max
(and the HU ones, if they aren't already)
I've never understood why 6 max and FR are lumped together, as that kind of ruins any sort of statistical analysis you'd want to do without getting into all kinds of filtering. They are different games and should be treated as such.
Thanks.