tundra
08-08-2010, 11:24 AM
Here, I have filtered for my play at Cap NL games and looked at the Stack Size report:
http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g250/thespatulaofdesire/capstacksize.jpg
It seems to me that the desired functionality of Stack Size filters in Cap NL games would be to treat stack sizes over 30bb as 30bb stacks. Surely there is no distinction to be made between a medium 85bb stack and a large 115bb stack when there's a cap at 30bb.
My motivation here is that I also play Shallow tables where much of my play is in the 30bb range, and I would like to be able to look at my stats and winrate specifically for shorter stack sizes, with both Cap and Shallow tables pooled together.
Is this behavior intentional, or an oversight? Is it easy to fix?
http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g250/thespatulaofdesire/capstacksize.jpg
It seems to me that the desired functionality of Stack Size filters in Cap NL games would be to treat stack sizes over 30bb as 30bb stacks. Surely there is no distinction to be made between a medium 85bb stack and a large 115bb stack when there's a cap at 30bb.
My motivation here is that I also play Shallow tables where much of my play is in the 30bb range, and I would like to be able to look at my stats and winrate specifically for shorter stack sizes, with both Cap and Shallow tables pooled together.
Is this behavior intentional, or an oversight? Is it easy to fix?