TJD
10-16-2008, 06:35 AM
I have started to play some HU so I am reviewing hands by "matches"
There seems to be some unusual reporting in HEM. An example:-
I had a player against whom I played in the am and then pm. His stats show him to have played 248 hands in the day losing $10.25
If I look at vs Players for him it shows that he played me in 246 hands winning $4.50. If I look at the rake statistic in "reports" that shows $15.41 so even that number does not explain the difference.
I tried to filter out each "session" against this player so I selected the later one via sessions and right clicking to change filters but this had 3 players shown. However, despite the filter being in place if I highlight the player against whom I had played twice in the vs players tab, the hands list below includes "all hands" when I set BB's won/lost to 0. I would expect the lower pane to apply the filter as well.
The total wins/losses against these 3 players = 83 which is the number of hands that the reports tab shows for me. However, once again the $ column for all 3 players adds up to $87 but the report tab shows $81.30. Again, the rake shown of $4.30 does not account for the difference.. If I want to know how much I win/lose against a player clearly rake needs to be taken into account.
I wanted to isolate the hands v this particular player so I was going to alter the start/end time for the session to include this player only but the replayer was showing odd behaviour interleaving hands from another "match".
I then discovered that despite having selected a table by name in the session tab which showed 43 hands the filter when applied covered all hands (83 hands) that were played during the time that table was open even at other tables. As I had other tables open at some time during this time span HEM had included those as well despite my filter requesting a particular table starting at a particular time.
This interleaving is not helpful even at 6 max or FR tables. If I want to see how a day went then it is better for me to see the play in order as it happens to understand the "flow" of the games rather than have tables popping up acording to time. It would be horrendous for someone 12 tabling to try to review how it went on table "X" where there was a particularly interesting player.
Trevor
PS Great program by the way!
PPS - I can clearly get the information by selecting this player for yesterday and looking at his performance which will be the mirror image of mine but it would/should be easier to get it from my own stats via sessions and vs players
cheers
trevor
There seems to be some unusual reporting in HEM. An example:-
I had a player against whom I played in the am and then pm. His stats show him to have played 248 hands in the day losing $10.25
If I look at vs Players for him it shows that he played me in 246 hands winning $4.50. If I look at the rake statistic in "reports" that shows $15.41 so even that number does not explain the difference.
I tried to filter out each "session" against this player so I selected the later one via sessions and right clicking to change filters but this had 3 players shown. However, despite the filter being in place if I highlight the player against whom I had played twice in the vs players tab, the hands list below includes "all hands" when I set BB's won/lost to 0. I would expect the lower pane to apply the filter as well.
The total wins/losses against these 3 players = 83 which is the number of hands that the reports tab shows for me. However, once again the $ column for all 3 players adds up to $87 but the report tab shows $81.30. Again, the rake shown of $4.30 does not account for the difference.. If I want to know how much I win/lose against a player clearly rake needs to be taken into account.
I wanted to isolate the hands v this particular player so I was going to alter the start/end time for the session to include this player only but the replayer was showing odd behaviour interleaving hands from another "match".
I then discovered that despite having selected a table by name in the session tab which showed 43 hands the filter when applied covered all hands (83 hands) that were played during the time that table was open even at other tables. As I had other tables open at some time during this time span HEM had included those as well despite my filter requesting a particular table starting at a particular time.
This interleaving is not helpful even at 6 max or FR tables. If I want to see how a day went then it is better for me to see the play in order as it happens to understand the "flow" of the games rather than have tables popping up acording to time. It would be horrendous for someone 12 tabling to try to review how it went on table "X" where there was a particularly interesting player.
Trevor
PS Great program by the way!
PPS - I can clearly get the information by selecting this player for yesterday and looking at his performance which will be the mirror image of mine but it would/should be easier to get it from my own stats via sessions and vs players
cheers
trevor