PDA

View Full Version : Filter bug?



St3v3k4hn
04-07-2010, 01:19 AM
I am trying to filter hands that were all in preflop and bigger than 200 BBs. Am I missing something or is this a bug?

netsrak
04-07-2010, 04:05 AM
Could you please explain in more detail what you think is wrong and please post a bigger screenshot.

Which HM Version are you using?

St3v3k4hn
04-07-2010, 01:19 PM
Could you please explain in more detail what you think is wrong and please post a bigger screenshot.

Which HM Version are you using?

I am filtering for hands that were all in preflop and > 200 bbs, but the results include hands < 200 bbs (1st entry is -141.08, 2nd is 57.6, 3rd is 91.72, etc).

Latest beta (1.10.04b).

_Loki_
04-07-2010, 05:29 PM
##############
It is easily possible for the final pot size to be >200 & you only go AI with say 50bb. And if you lost that one your bbs might be -50bb

##############
The bbs figure is how many bbs YOU have won or lost
It doesn't represent the final pot size & it isn't directly related to the final pot size

Run those hands in replayer & I think you'll find that the final pot size is > 200bb
But you must run replayer bet-by-bet using the + button or you will miss the overbets that are returned before the flop is dealt (see below)

##############
The final pot size figure INCLUDES chips returned to a player who overbets
Here is an example where the Final Pot Size filter regards this as >200, but I regard it as 190

preflop 6max example:
The pot is 60
Villain goes AI 100 as his first bet (pot = 160)
Hero goes AI 65 as his first bet (pot = 225)
everyone else folds (pot = 225)
The Villain has overbet by 35 which is returned to him (pot = 190)
Flop cards are dealt...

##############
If the Villain wins: Hero bbs = -65
If the Villain loses: Hero bbs = +125 (190-65)

##############

_Loki_
04-07-2010, 05:48 PM
So I think there is a bug - because the filter includes the overbets & that seems incorrect to me

St3v3k4hn
04-07-2010, 07:26 PM
So I think there is a bug - because the filter includes the overbets & that seems incorrect to me

Thanks for the explanation. It does seem to work as explained. But I would agree that it doesn't work the way one would expect, and therefore should be considered a bug...