sqlguy
05-18-2012, 06:55 AM
If I understand correctly, "WC Rake" stat should be the correct stat for Pokerstars (and most other sites for that matter) to double-check/estimate VPPs/rakeback.
But SESSIONS uses "Rake" stat which presumably is based on dealt method.
Should not SESSIONS use "WC Rake", or at least have that option? Best would be to choose the stat depending on what site it applies to.
Unfortunately, neither stat seems to be particularly accurate, at least when I compare it to the number of VPPs earned during a session with Pokerstars. What can be the reason for this?
But SESSIONS uses "Rake" stat which presumably is based on dealt method.
Should not SESSIONS use "WC Rake", or at least have that option? Best would be to choose the stat depending on what site it applies to.
Unfortunately, neither stat seems to be particularly accurate, at least when I compare it to the number of VPPs earned during a session with Pokerstars. What can be the reason for this?