negtv capability
10-28-2009, 02:57 AM
Limp fold %. What % ranges are too loose and/ or tight?
I'm trying to color code for this stat under player preferences.
I use green (loose), red (plays correctly) and yellow (tight or folds too much).
I'm guessing it would be something like this:
Limp folds >66% = too tight/ weak (yellow)
Limp folds <33% = too loose (green)
Limp folds >33%, but <66% = about right/ plays correct (red)
hmmmm... or maybe use 33, 50 as the markers... idk
I use this stat along w others to decide whether iso raise or not. I guess if someone is folding >40%, it's often a good play? (depending on who is behind me obv.) Should I just use 40 then for yellow and green and not worry abt the red.
There probably isn't a correct limp fold % anyways? B/C limping isn't optimal.
* I'm aware that iso is often also a good play even if they call. b/c o' cb, position., etc.
I'm trying to color code for this stat under player preferences.
I use green (loose), red (plays correctly) and yellow (tight or folds too much).
I'm guessing it would be something like this:
Limp folds >66% = too tight/ weak (yellow)
Limp folds <33% = too loose (green)
Limp folds >33%, but <66% = about right/ plays correct (red)
hmmmm... or maybe use 33, 50 as the markers... idk
I use this stat along w others to decide whether iso raise or not. I guess if someone is folding >40%, it's often a good play? (depending on who is behind me obv.) Should I just use 40 then for yellow and green and not worry abt the red.
There probably isn't a correct limp fold % anyways? B/C limping isn't optimal.
* I'm aware that iso is often also a good play even if they call. b/c o' cb, position., etc.