jesseicp
10-07-2009, 06:41 PM
Everything that I have been able to find so far discussing the Luck Adjusted Winning section tells me that it's all calculated using ICM and should therefore be correct. Also, based on the way I consistently feel like I'm running in general and the fact that it can't be wrong if it's calculated using ICM, I concur with this graph.
HOWEVER, Jesus Christ.... Look at it. I have an average buy in of $4.86, mostly composed of $5 reg SNG's and $3.4 turbos, all from stars. All MTT's have been deleted from Hold'em Manager leaving only my STT SNG history. Over an 884 game sample, there is a 62 buy in and $197.68 difference between my actual winnings and luck adjusted.
I guess since I am not really questioning the functionality of it, my main question is this....has anyone else ran this bad for this long? I haven't seen any other graphs around so far like this. Tell me it gets better.
Someone at least say something to make me feel better. :(
HOWEVER, Jesus Christ.... Look at it. I have an average buy in of $4.86, mostly composed of $5 reg SNG's and $3.4 turbos, all from stars. All MTT's have been deleted from Hold'em Manager leaving only my STT SNG history. Over an 884 game sample, there is a 62 buy in and $197.68 difference between my actual winnings and luck adjusted.
I guess since I am not really questioning the functionality of it, my main question is this....has anyone else ran this bad for this long? I haven't seen any other graphs around so far like this. Tell me it gets better.
Someone at least say something to make me feel better. :(