Djay
08-11-2009, 01:17 PM
As a longtime Pokertracker user i have purchased and been using HEM for for the last three months due to no PLO support in PT. I use both trackers now. This is offcourse not very practical and im thinking of switching to HEM alone.
For me though - Multiple databases is a must. Spcially for the table scanner there is no way around this for me.
I know HEM does not support multiple databases as of now, but im looking to know if this is something you want to add in the future. Preferrably for the entire software, but espesially for the table scanner. If yes, what is the timeframe on this?
Maybe this should have been posted in the table manager forum, but Im kinda hoping to get "yes HEM will support multiple databases in next release".
If the answes is "no", I am curious as to what the arguments for that decision is. I hear you saying that you can have "millions of hands" in a regular HEM base, but i disagree. The speed slows down as it grows rather large.
Thanks in advance for your reply.
For me though - Multiple databases is a must. Spcially for the table scanner there is no way around this for me.
I know HEM does not support multiple databases as of now, but im looking to know if this is something you want to add in the future. Preferrably for the entire software, but espesially for the table scanner. If yes, what is the timeframe on this?
Maybe this should have been posted in the table manager forum, but Im kinda hoping to get "yes HEM will support multiple databases in next release".
If the answes is "no", I am curious as to what the arguments for that decision is. I hear you saying that you can have "millions of hands" in a regular HEM base, but i disagree. The speed slows down as it grows rather large.
Thanks in advance for your reply.