TJD
05-19-2009, 06:03 AM
I have used Spadeye for a long time but I will probably buy the scanner when it becomes "paid" because I have recently started to play on ipoker and do not have the software to scan that.
In addition, I like the integration of the table selection into HEM because it seems to work much faster.
However, it is missing a very useful feature of Spadeeye and that is the number of tables count. I know I can use the player pane and count manually from there but while reviewing scanned tables the information that:-
as well as the 2 fish and 1 "meh" player, the two TAG types are playing 12 tables as opposed to 2 is VERY useful. It makes that table much more valuable.
Cheers
Trevor
In addition, I like the integration of the table selection into HEM because it seems to work much faster.
However, it is missing a very useful feature of Spadeeye and that is the number of tables count. I know I can use the player pane and count manually from there but while reviewing scanned tables the information that:-
as well as the 2 fish and 1 "meh" player, the two TAG types are playing 12 tables as opposed to 2 is VERY useful. It makes that table much more valuable.
Cheers
Trevor